Thread:Tanglefrost/@comment-28799877-20150618143642/@comment-5277627-20150619022748

Especially reading episode three and subsequent episodes, I did notice Rudy getting a winner's edit. To me it seems that everything good is happening to Rudy and nothing bad. He's winning lots of challenges; all the jury love him. He's basically a shoo-in if he makes FTC, IMO.

It's not necessarily a bad thing but it does take out a little bit of excitement. I think, for your next fanon, give EVERY character a flaw. Give them something that the jury won't like, no matter how good they play their game.

For example, it could be that someone is really likeable, but made absolutely no strategic moves whatsoever and got to FTC by staying loyal to their alliances. Or it could be that someone was very strategic, but ended up annoying a couple of people. You get what I mean? That way it makes the game more exciting as more people are on that level playing field. :)

I hope I'm not coming across as rude, because that's not my intention. I'm not very experienced either. I've only written 5 episodes of my first season, so I'm bound to get better, so please don't take my word like the gospel. Please remember this is just my opinion. :)