User blog comment:UnderAPineapple/Announcement (Somebody Must Be Fired)/@comment-27391152-20180103020319/@comment-32574574-20180103024557

"Are you really trying to say that LOGAN PAUL was intelligent enough to think 'hm... maybe if I go to the suicide forest, show a dead body and then laugh about it, it'll be so controversial that I'll get so much attention and views!'"

​Yes and no. I don't think anyone intelligent would ever consider doing what Logan did, but I do believe he did it for attention. I also don't believe he showed a corpse on camera for the purpose of helping kids with suicidal thoughts. I believe Logan's argument on that is horse shit and I think I stated why, but I do agree that Logan is an idiot.

​"As for the demonetising of videos, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it based on what advertisers are willing to have their ads featured on, not 'Youtube's leftist agenda'?"

​You might be right. I never looked into the problem of advertisements, as I get a lot of political ads (from both left-wingers and right-wingers). When I say demonetizing, I'm talking about YouTube creators getting money for their content, and getting support from YouTube. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

​"And when it comes to videos depicting criminal content, considering how much content is uploaded to Youtube, they cannot single-handedly go through every video to check their content. "

You got a point. But it still doesn't mean it should stay up there. YouTube has created a list of rules, and basically what they say is that they prohibit violent and/or pornographic content on YouTube. People who are new to the website (aka people who recently made an account), are going to see that as they are posting their content on a safe and secure website with no access to criminal content. By YouTube not removing or evaluating this type of content and leaving it alone, they are allowing it to grow on YouTube. In addition, they violate their own guidelines by allowing this content to stay on YouTube. Kids go to YouTube to watch entertaining, educational, and/or acceptable content. If people want to look at porn, go to PornHub.

"Like I'm very confused. How you feel she is endorsing these types of videos? "

I feel she is indirectly endorsing these videos. It has become obvious due to the large amount of complaints sent in to her, that the scandal surrounding criminal content on YouTube is present. When a large amount of people are saying that this stuff is going on, and the staff doesn't do much to prevent it, it's a problem. So I feel that if she and her staff don't get off their fat asses and put a stop to this, then she should be fired.

"But as far as I'm aware, there's nothing Susan has done to warrant her a prison sentence. "

I know you said something about her not being a criminal beforehand, and I'll answer both of those statements with this: Susan Wojcicki has a job. Her job is to lead a business establishment that is supposed to provide entertainment and opportunity for everyone. It's kind of like being a Hollywood director, as she's in charge and she has the option of who to allow/cast in her business/movie. Let's say one of the content creators/movie actors is doing sinister activities, and there are multiple complaints. The staff/director should then be able to say "You know what, you're not safe for my audience/cast, and you have to go". The YouTube staff has been receiving a boatload of complaints about this and yet nothing has occurred. Nobody from YouTube has addressed these complaints, and it makes me feel like they aren't doing anything. They just continue and continue to throw it under the rug. That's allowing criminal activity to continue, and it's permitting this to continue. So I believe that whilst she is not directly doing criminal activity, she sure as hell is doing a terrible job at preventing it from her business.