User blog comment:Iloveschool71/An idea.../@comment-26485526-20151127052633

I can't say I like the idea unfortunately. I just feel that with 4 people in the finals, it's a little too crowded at the top. Especially if the jury is 7-9 people, a tie vote would be very likely to occur.

Not only that, but alliances of 4 are pretty powerful in Survivor. Once those 4 gain the majority, there'd be no need to make big moves because they're all going to the end. At least with a final 2 or a final 3, people could use the argument that there's a definite "bottom" of the alliance. I just fear it might take away from some of the excitement of the mid-late merge.

Overall I think it's one of those that sound amazing in theory, but would flop in practice.