Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-27391152-20180904100425/@comment-25201371-20180914040710

Tozza so coming from a writers perspective I tied breaking the stupid is not the wisest choice, especially since it's been tradition to just let both people win.

If it's a fanon then the people view both fanons or authors or whatever as equally funny, dramatic, shocking, amazing or whatever people judge their criteria on. Like no one had an issue with sharing in the past, so no one should have issues with it now.

There shouldn't be honor in trying to win, these awards are here to recognize great authors doing great things in this community. If they are equally great then that's honestly amazing they both should be recognized. These awards arent the oscars or the emmys, these awards and here to help recognize great work being done, and encourage them to continue in their great work. This isn't supposed to be a competitive nature type thing but sadly it's become one as Greg said, it's become a popularity contest in a way. No saying the popular people deserve it, but I know some people may see this as people not caring about their fanons because the bigger ones are overtaking the smaller ones.

I care about fairness in this community and I feel as though some of the ways we do these are a bit unfair, I kinda want the award system to be modified so the newer/underated authors have a more equal chance to the older/popular authors.